(U.S. 8th Cir., Civil Rights,
Health Law, Labor & Employment Law) In an action claiming that defendant terminated plaintiff based on race, gender, and a perceived disability, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff's failure to submit a return-to-work release defeated her claim that her termination resulted from the designation of her disability as a mental illness.
Long v. Teachers' Ret. Sys. of State of Illinois
(U.S. 7th Cir., Civil Rights,
Family Law,
Government Law, Health Law, Labor & Employment Law) In plaintiff's employment discrimination and retaliation action against her former employer, summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where, because plaintiff failed to present evidence that defendant acted with retaliatory intent when it fired her, a jury could not infer that defendant fired her because she took FMLA leave.
McBride v. BIC Consumer Prods. Mfg. Co.
(U.S. 2d Cir., Civil Rights, Health Law, Labor & Employment Law) In an action alleging that defendant-employer violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by terminating plaintiff's employment rather than reasonably accommodating her disability, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to provide evidence that, with aid of a reasonable accommodation, she was qualified for either her pre-disability position or a suitable vacant position to which she could have been reassigned; and 2) in the absence of such evidence, an employer's failure to engage in an interactive process intended to discover an accommodation suitable to both parties is immaterial.
Lytes v. D.C. Water & Sewer Auth.
(U.S. D.C. Cir., Health Law, Labor & Employment Law) In an Americans with Disabilities Act action claiming that defendant refused to accommodate plaintiff's disability and then terminated his employment, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where no reasonable jury could find that plaintiff was disabled when he was refused accommodation and discharged.
Cooper v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
(U.S. 5th Cir., ERISA, Health Law, Labor & Employment Law) In an ERISA action seeking continued disability benefits under defendant's disability plan, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff received a full and fair review of the specific grounds upon which her benefit claim was initially denied; and 2) the medical evidence in the record indicated not only that defendant hypothetically could maintain employment, but rather, her medical records demonstrated that at the time of defendant's initial decision, plaintiff was maintaining gainful employment.
More news & reviews:
Share:
What is My Employment Law?
Every hour, we bring the best news and advice from dozens of blogs and sites to one place for our community of experts and enthusiasts to vote on what's most interesting each day. Join the conversation and
submit an article for publication on My Employment Law!
Put fresh news from My Employment Law on your site
Embed our widget to your blog or site and get the latest headlines from My Employment Law automatically updated each hour.
Click to highlight and press Ctrl+C to copy
Widget preview:
What's Hot Today