In a putative class action pending in the federal court for the
Northern District of California, Sullivan v. Kelly Services, Inc.
(Case No. C 08-3893 CW), Judge Claudia Wilken, ruling on cross
motions for summary judgment, has held that the time spent
interviewing by a Kelly Services employee seeking temporary work
assignments with Kelly Services' clients is compensable under
California law. However, Judge Wilken also ruled that the time
spent preparing for and commuting to the client interviews was not
compensable, nor was Kelly Services required to reimburse the
employees for expenses incurred in attending the interviews.

Blog About: Staffing Companies Face Potential Exposure for Interview Time.
Continue the discussion on your blog. Click to highlight this excerpt and press Ctrl+C to copy.
Related Articles
Are Your Recruiters Exempt or Non-Exempt? Recent Court Cases Scrutinize Staffing Industry Classification Practices
Recently, a California appeals court sent shockwaves through the
staffing industry when it ruled in Pellegrino v. Robert Half
International, Inc., No. G039985,1 that staffing firm recruiters
are not overtime-exempt administrative employees under California
law. Since many staffing firms classify their recruiters as exempt
administrative employees, there was concern that this decision
could have a sweeping effect on staffing industry overtime
classification practices. Soon after Pellegrino, a federal district
court in Maryland decided Andrade v. Aerotek, Inc., No.
CCB-08-2668,2 another case in which a staffing firm recruiter
challenged her classification as administratively exempt from the
require...
Hospitals Providing Medical Services to Federal Employees Through an HMO are Covered Subcontractors Under OFCCP's Jurisdiction.
For many years, health systems reasonably assumed that arrangements with a non-governmental entity to provide services or benefits to federal employees would not invoke the jurisdiction of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs OFCCP, and thus would not mandate federal equal employment and affirmative action obligations.
pa href"http:feedads.g.doubleclick.netaVk0EpM6nU5qocM0o4QHNEizI51E0da"img src"http:feedads.g.doubleclick.netaVk0EpM6nU5qocM0o4QHNEizI51E0di" border"0" ismap"true"imgabr
a href"http:feedads.g.doubleclick.netaVk0EpM6nU5qocM0o4QHNEizI51E1da"img src"http:feedads.g.doubleclick.netaVk0EpM6nU5qocM0o4QHNEizI51E1di" border"0" ismap"true"imgapimg src"http:feeds.feedburner.comrEmploymentLawArticles4sXwill...
Hospitals Providing Medical Services to Federal Employees Through an HMO are Covered Subcontractors Under OFCCP's Jurisdiction.
For many years, health systems reasonably assumed that arrangements with a non-governmental entity to provide services or benefits to federal employees would not invoke the jurisdiction of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), and thus would not mandate federal equal employment and affirmative action obligations.



CIS Interpretation Will Curtail H-1 Status for Self-Employed, Independent Contractors, and Employees of Staffing Companies.
On January 6, 2010, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services issued interpretive guidance regarding the employer-employee relationship and how that must be documented in H-1 cases. The net effect of the CIS memorandum is to deny H-1 status to independent
contractors and self-employed individuals, as well as limit the ability of staffing companies and PEO's to use H-1 visas to place workers at client job sites.

Employers Responsible For Employee Online Behavior (pdf).
Few
business owners realize that
they can be held
responsible for what
employees say about
the companys products
or services when
the employee is
using social media
like Facebook,
MySpace, Twitter
and personal
blogs.
However, under
recently issued federal
regulations, thats
precisely the case.


More news & reviews:
Share: