Courts typically have dismissed discrimination claims under Title
VII if those claims were made by an independent
contractor,
rather than by an “employee†of the
company. However, 42 U.S.C. §1981
(“Section 1981â€), which prohibits
racial discrimination in the formation of contracts, states that
“all persons†shall have the same
right “to make and enforce contracts as is
enjoyed by white citizens.†In a case of first
impression for the 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, that court has
followed prior decisions of three sister-appellate courts in
holding that an independent
contractor may sue f...
Blog About: Independent Contractor May Bring Section 1981 Race Discrimination Claim.
Continue the discussion on your blog. Click to highlight this excerpt and press Ctrl+C to copy.
Related Articles
Section 1981 Race Discrimination Claim Cannot Survive Without a Contractual Interest as its Basis.
Under certain circumstances, 42 U.S.C. §1981 (Section 1981) creates a federal cause of action for individuals claiming intentional racial discrimination. To support such a claim, a plaintiff must allege that he is a member of a racial minority, and that he was discriminated against within a particular group of activities set forth in the statute. Those activities include the right to “make and enforce contracts . . . as is enjoyed by white citizens.” The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal recently dismissed the claims of a
physician who claimed that the suspension of his medical staff privileges violated rights protected by Section 1981, holding that such privileges did not constitute contractual rights as defined...
Section 1981 race discrimination claim cannot survive without a contractual interest as its basis.
Under certain circumstances, 42 U.S.C. §1981 (Section 1981) creates a federal cause of action for individuals claiming intentional racial discrimination. To support such a claim, a plaintiff must allege that he is a member of a racial minority, and that he was discriminated against within a particular group of activities set forth in the statute. Those activities include the right to make and enforce contracts . . . as is enjoyed by white citizens. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal recently dismissed the claims of a physician who claimed that the suspension of his medical staff privileges violated rights protected by Section 1981, holding that such privileges did not constitute contractual rights as defined by the statute
New Prohibitions of Mandatory Arbitration for Defense Contractors
Ninth Circuit Delivers Blow to Employer in Independent Contractor Classification Case
By
Dan Forman
Continuing the recent trend in questioniong the propriety of
classifying workers as independent contractors instead of
employees, the Ninth Circuit reversed an employer's victory on this
issue in
Narayan v. EGL, Inc. EGL, headquartered and
incorporated in Texas, contracts with hundreds of persons and is
the employer of hundreds of employees worldwide. EGL enters
into contracts with persons intended to be independent contractors
(ICs). The ICs lease vehicles and acknowledge that...
Defense Appropriations Bill Restricts Federal Defense Contractors Use of Arbitration Agreements.
On December 19, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Fiscal Year 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (the "Act"). Embedded in this $636 billion spending measure is a provision that prohibits federal
contractors receiving Defense Department funds for contracts in excess of $1,000,000 from requiring their employees or independent
contractors to arbitrate certain disputes, including claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Such federal
contractors also will be required to ...
More news & reviews:
Share: