RSS feed - Add your feed to our index
■ Submit an article to My Employment Law


Your daily summary of the top employment and labor law headlines

5
votes
On September 2, 2009, the Transportation Trades Department (TTD), AFL-CIO, petitioned the National Mediation Board (NMB) to change the 75-year-old majority rule, which requires a majority of eligible voters in a craft or class to cast ballots for representation before the NMB will certify a union as the bargaining representative for that craft or class. The TTD's petition asked the NMB to replace the majority rule with a rule that would allow a union to be certified if a majority of the employees who cast ballots voted for union representation. On November 3, 2009, two members of the NMB submitted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to the Federal Register. The NPRM stated that the NMB intended to change the majority rule to a minority rule. On December 7, 2009, the NMB held an "open me...
Discovered 8 months ago | 0 comments
Blog About: Airline Legal Alert: Status of NMB's Attempt to Change 75-Year-Old Majority Rule.
Continue the discussion on your blog. Click to highlight this excerpt and press Ctrl+C to copy.
Related Articles
Airline Legal Alert: Industry Challenge to NMB's Final Rule.
On May 17, 2010, the Air Transport Association of America, Inc. ("ATA") filed suit against the National Mediation Board in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the NMB's recent change to its longstanding rule regarding how representation elections are conducted. As discussed in our May 10, 2010 Legal Alert, the NMB's final rule changes the manner in which RLA elections have been conducted for over 75 years. Since the NMB's inception, the NMB has repeatedly held that, in order for a union to be certified as the bargaining representative for a craft or class, a majority of eligible employees must vote for representation. The final rule will drastically change this requirement, allowing a union to be certified as the bar...
Read more
Airline Legal Alert: NMB Publishes Final Rule.
On May 11, 2010, the Federal Register will publish the Final Rule of the National Mediation Board (NMB) regarding the process it will employ in determining the outcome of representation elections. When the rule goes into effect, it will replace the NMB's historic majority rule, under which a majority of the entire craft or class had to vote for representation before a union would be certified to represent that craft or class, in favor of a process that is based on the majority of votes cast.


Read more
What Do Employers with HIPAA-Covered Health Plans Really Need to Know About Recently Proposed Revisions to HIPAA Regulations?
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published on July 14, 2010, a voluminous Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), containing dozens of proposed amendments to three sets of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) regulations: the Privacy Rule; the Security Rule; and the Enforcement Rule. The proposed amendments are directed principally at implementing the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), which amended HIPAA and went into effect on February 17, 2010. A careful review of the NPRM for its impact on employers who sponsor HIPAA-covered plans reveals that, if the proposed changes were adopted, employers would...
Read more
Airline Legal Alert: NMB Rules Under Union Siege.
In a blatant effort to take advantage of a change in the membership of the National Mediation Board (NMB), unions have petitioned the NMB to alter its longstanding procedures on how representation elections are conducted.


Read more
DOT Reinstates Rule for Direct Observation Collection of Certain Drug Tests, Effective August 31.
The United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”) has reinstated a rule requiring direct observation of employees providing urine specimens during return-to-duty and follow-up drug tests. The rule was published in the Federal Register on July 30, 2009, and will become effective on August 31, 2009.


More news & reviews:
Share:

Leave your comment
Name:

Comment:

What is My Employment Law?
Every hour, we bring the best news and advice from dozens of blogs and sites to one place for our community of experts and enthusiasts to vote on what's most interesting each day. Join the conversation and submit an article for publication on My Employment Law!
Put fresh news from My Employment Law on your site
Embed our widget to your blog or site and get the latest headlines from My Employment Law automatically updated each hour.
Click to highlight and press Ctrl+C to copy
Widget preview:
Latest Articles
Powered by: MyEmploymentLaw
What's Hot Today
The Department of Health and Human Services Issues Guidance Regarding Security Breaches Concerning HIPAA-Protected Information.
Employers Should Carefully Consider Whether To Sue Former Employees For Threatened Trade Secret Misappropriation Based On Recent California Court of Appeal Decision Awarding Over 1.6 Million To
EEOC revising rules to conform to ADA Amendments Act
Civil Serv. Employees Assn. v. NLRB
Employee Awarded 4.1 Billion in Wrongful TerminationBreach of Contract Arbitration And No, That is Not a Typo
Office Space: Reassignment of Office Enough to Establish Claim of Retaliation But Not Discrimination
Law adds scrutiny to child labor enforcement
Labor Department Offers Incentives for Employers in CNY
Damned If You Do, Damned If You Dont: Terminating Accused Harasser Can Lead to Liability for quotSex Stereotypingquot
Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't: Terminating Accused Harasser Can Lead to Liability for "Sex Stereotyping"
Supervisors Without Authority to Affect Employment Status of Other Workers Are not Managers for Purpose of Title VII.
Crawford v. City of Los Angeles
Can Benefits Lawyers Other Service Providers be Sued for Malpractice for Services to ERISA Plans?
Hospitals Providing Medical Services to Federal Employees Through an HMO are Covered Subcontractors Under OFCCP's Jurisdiction.
Supervisors Without Authority to Affect Employment Status of Other Workers Are not “Managers” for Purpose of Title VII.
Hospitals Providing Medical Services to Federal Employees Through an HMO are Covered Subcontractors Under OFCCP's Jurisdiction.
Supreme Court cases still to be decided - AP
BREAKING: Ricci v. DeStefano - Supreme Court Reverses Second Circuit And Finds New Haven Violated Title VII in 5-4 Decision
Farr v. St. Francis Hospital and Health Centers
Ricci v. DeStefano - The Best of Today's Coverage of the Supreme Court Decision

Contact Us - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy